Wednesday, January 19, 2011

We've all thought about it at one time...

Since President Obama's election I have routinely thought about the possibility that his life is in true jeopardy. This article gives some of the reasons.

We are faced with an opportunity to transform the violent rhetoric and true interpersonal violence at a variety of levels. What it will take is each one of becoming engaged. It will take each one of us being willing to face truths about our own identity and self. It will take a true human revolution.


Dingell: Current Political Climate Is Similar To When JFK Was Assassinated


First Posted: 01/19/11 03:45 PM Updated: 01/19/11 04:07 PM

WASHINGTON -- While pundits debate whether the tone in Washington will change in the aftermath of the tragic shooting in Arizona, the dean of the U.S. House of Representatives predicts that the respite in vitriol will be short lived.

Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.), who has served in the House since 1955, is the chamber's longest continuously serving member. In an interview with The Huffington Post on Tuesday, he compared the current political climate to that of the early 1960s, when President John F. Kennedy was assassinated.

"They sort of go in peaks and valleys," Dingell said. "If you'll remember that just before Kennedy was shot, they were using the same kind of rhetoric, and two weeks before, they attacked Lyndon Johnson when he visited Dallas. A little later, Kennedy was shot, and all of a sudden, they said, 'My, this is terrible, we can't do this sort of thing again.' It's as if we're seeing the same type of temporary reform occurring here today."

"One always hopes that these things will be of lasting character," he added, "but there's every reason to assume, given the behavior of these people on the other side, this will be of temporary duration, and we will be hearing the same thing."

In his book Before the Storm, which analyzes the influence of former Arizona senator and presidential candidate Barry Goldwater, historian Rick Perlstein wrote about the climate surrounding Kennedy's trip to Dallas:

Kennedy's press secretary, Pierre Salinger, was spooked. He had received a letter on November 19 from a Dallas woman: "Don't let the President come down here. I'm worried about him. I think something terrible will happen to him." Salinger answered the letter personally: "I appreciate your concern for the president, but it would be a sad day for this country if there were any city in the United States he could not visit without fear of violence. I am confident the people of Dallas will greet him warmly." [...]

Extremists were distributing in the street a "WANTED FOR TREASON" handbill produced by General Walker's Dallas business partner, with face-forward and profile "mug shots" of the President. The Dallas Morning News editorialized: "If the speech is about boating you will be among the warmest of admirers. If it is about Cuber [sic], civil rights, taxes, or Vietnam, there will sure as shootin' be some who heave to and let go with a broadside of grapeshot in the presidential rigging." [...]

The newspaper hit the streets as H.L. Hunt, whose son had helped bankroll the ad, took to the radio in full-throated bray to predict that Kennedy's next move after passing the civil rights bill would be revoking the right to bear arms. "In dictatorships," he said, "no firearms are permitted, because they would then have the weapons with which to rise up against their oppressors."

Dingell said that since he has been in office, the number of death threats he has received have jumped significantly and now occasionally involve his wife.

"There's less goodwill, more bad will, more nastiness, more threats," he said. "The occurrence of threats in election time in my own case has gone up, and while I certainly expect threats to me, I find it a matter of deep resentment on my part that the death threats are now being heard by my wife."

Dingell has been outspoken in his condemnation of right-wing rhetoric in the days following the shooting in Tucson that targeted Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.). In a Jan. 12 speech on the House floor, he said, "Over the years, I have witnessed horrendous events -- the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Robert Kennedy. I have seen firsthand the anger brought on by landmark, life changing legislation. The rage during the civil rights debates was unlike anything I had seen, until now. ... What is different today is not the anger and apprehension felt by some in this country, but the inciting speech, dare I say encouragement, given by well-established folks in the seemingly mainstream political parties."

I AM GAY

Where to begin? It is well documented that the stigma of homosexuality, especially among African Americans, can lead to unsafe sexual practices that lead to the contraction of STIs, including HIV.

But I understand Joseph Allen's concern. If I were an unassuming 9-year-old boy, I would, upon reading this billboard, be instantly determined to be a black gay man. I am that impressionable. And to avoid the risk of my instant indoctrination, Mr. Allen wants to limit or completely stop outreach efforts to preserve and protect the health adult black men. Perfect sense to me.

So we're continuing to use the absence of logic and reason to cover bigotry, racism and homophobia.

The world sure is complex.

Pol Mad at Black Gay Pride Ads


I AM GAY BILLBOARD X390 (FAIR) | ADVOCATE.COM

A city councilman in Schenectady, N.Y., has voiced his disapproval of an advertising campaign promoting gay pride among black men.

"This kind of billboard is putting the stamp of approval on a gay lifestyle," councilman Joseph Allen told the Albany Times Union. He also told the newspaper that he is not homophobic, but the ads send the wrong message to children.

The billboards and other ads depict black men on the basketball court or at church with the words "I Am Gay" featured boldly.

The city's attorney has told Allen that an effort to pull the ads could not succeed because the content is protected by the First Amendment. In addition to ads on buses and bus shelters, 18 billboards are posted throughout Schenectady, Albany, Rensselaer and Montgomery counties, according to the article.

Tandra R. LaGrone, executive director of Albany-based In Our Own Voices, which sponsored the campaign with the New York Department of Health, said the ads' purpose was to "address the stigma and homophobia of being a black gay man."

UPDATE: Not that I had plans to go to Alabama...

It turns out....he wants to apologise. But notice his phrasing.

"If anyone from other religions felt disenfranchised by the language, I want to say I am sorry. I am sorry if I offended anyone in any way," Bentley said Wednesday.

My dear man. The is no "if" about it. People are offended. You are not taking responsibility for your words when you say "if I offended." You could say, "I did offend and I am sorry," but until you do your apology is not accepted!

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We should be furious. This is not "dangerously close" to violating the 1st amendment. He is violating the 1st amendment.

We are watching repetition of history playing out.


AL GOP Gov. Robert Bentley: If You're Not A Christian, You Need To Convert

Newly-elected GOP Alabama Gov. Robert Bentley made it clear yesterday that non-Christians will have a tough time under his regime.
Bentley made the remarks during a speech at Dexter Street King Memorial Baptist Church, the Montgomery church once led by the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., saying that non-Christians were “not my brother” and he hoped they would convert to Christianity. During the speech at the church in recognition of the King holiday Monday, Bentley told a packed audience that he is color blind to race, and then talked about his religious beliefs.

“But if you have been adopted in God’s family like I have, and like you have, if you’re a Christian and if you’re saved, and the Holy Spirit lives within you just like the Holy Spirit lives within me, then you know what that makes? It makes you and me brothers. And it makes you and me brother and sister,” he said. “Now I will have to say that, if we don’t have the same daddy, we’re not brothers and sisters. So anybody here today who has not accepted Jesus Christ as their savior, I’m telling you, you’re not my brother and you’re not my sister, and I want to be your brother.”
The Anti-Defamation League was quick to denounce Bentley's remarks, saying he was "dangerously close" to violating the First Amendment, which forbids government from promoting an official religion.

Between 2000 and 2006, "health insurance company profits quadrupled."

Have we been lulled into a state of complacency? At what point can we as a united people synthesize the qualities of informed, educated, passionate, determined, adamant, and reasoned to stop the disgusting abuse of power by corporations?


The Truth-O-Meter Says:
Van Hollen

Between 2000 and 2006, "health insurance company profits quadrupled."

Chris Van Hollen on Tuesday, January 18th, 2011 in comments on the House floor

Rep. Chris Van Hollen says insurance company profits quadrupled

As the debate over a Republican effort to repeal the health care reform law kicked into high gear on Jan. 18, 2011, Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., argued against repeal and began by citing a couple of statistics to set the stakes.

"I'm interested to hear my colleagues say that they can identify with all the problems in the health care system," Van Hollen said from the floor of the House. "Between the year 2000 and 2006, premiums in this country doubled, health insurance company profits quadrupled, and this Congress did nothing."

This statistic is nothing new in the health care debate.

In fact, we first visited a very similar claim when Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., wrote a Sept. 21, 2009, opinion piece for the Capitol Hill newspaper Roll Call in which he said, "Insurance companies have seen their profits soar by more than 400 percent since 2001, while premiums for consumers have doubled."

As we did then, we'll break this into two fact-checks. We'll deal with the claim about premiums in a separate item.

Here we'll address Van Hollen's claim that health insurance company profits quadrupled between 2000 and 2006. And we'll borrow heavily from our fact-check of that similar claim made by Rockefeller in September 2009.

Rockefeller took his numbers about insurance company profits from a study sponsored by Health Care for America Now. Researchers for HCAN looked at financial data submitted by 10 large, publicly held health insurers to the Securities and Exchange Commission, covering the years between 2000 and 2008. The 10 companies are Aetna, Amerigroup, Centene, CIGNA, Coventry, Health Net, Humana, UnitedHealth Group, Universal American Group and WellPoint.

HCAN is a liberal group that supported the Democratic health care reform efforts, so we checked a few of HCAN's numbers by looking at some of the original disclosure forms on the SEC website and found no notable discrepancies. So the study appears sound.

The researchers found that the collective profits of these 10 companies rose from $2.41 billion in 2001 to $12.87 billion in 2007 — a 466 percent increase, meaning that, over that period of time, they more than quadrupled.

We dinged Rockefeller a bit for cherry-picking years, because, if you used, instead, the years 2001 through 2008, the data show that profits rose from $2.41 billion to $8.40 billion — a 249 percent increase. That's still a whopping jump, but it's not as high as the increase Rockefeller cited. The general dropoff in the economy had a lot to do with the lower profits in 2008, said Alex Lawson, a health care researcher for Campaign for America's Future, a liberal group, who co-authored the HCAN study, in a 2009 interview with PolitiFact.

Meanwhile, there's another caveat for HCAN's study. The group didn't adjust the profit statistics for corporate takeovers. When big companies absorb smaller ones, the net effect may be to enlarge the profits of the biggest companies (including many of the 10 giants in HCAN's study) even as the total size of the health insurance industry — the broader entity that Rockefeller seemed to be referring to — stays roughly the same. While doing such adjustments would have been logistically difficult, and maybe even impossible, the fact that they weren't done puts limits on how this data can be interpreted.

A health industry analyst, Steve Shubitz of Edward Jones, told us in 2009 that consolidation is "a very large part of this overall increase" in the higher profits by the remaining 10 companies. "Of course, these companies have increased profits, too, outside of acquisitions, but nowhere near to the extent that's implied by those stats," Shubitz said.

Lawson acknowledged that the HCAN chart on profits does not address how much of an impact consolidation had on profits. But he added that the table actually comes from a study that specifically addressed the harm to competition caused by consolidation, so the group hardly ignored that issue. In addition, he defended the decision to use numbers unadjusted for consolidation. "That's what the market reacts to, and that's what they put in their annual report," Lawson said.

The insurance industry, for its part, argues that total health plan profits are less than one penny of the total national health expenditure dollar. "The data is clear that profits are not what is driving rising health care costs," said Robert Zirkelbach, a spokesman for America's Health Insurance Plans, the leading health insurance trade group.

Back in 2009, we rated Rockefeller's claim Half True, noting that if he had carried the data forward to 2008 — an admittedly somewhat atypical year — the increase fell short of his stated quadrupling. But Van Hollen had a clearer reason to set the parameters between 2000 and 2006. Democrats regained control of the House in 2007. So it's fair for him to stop short of the 2008 figures. But as we noted when Rockefeller made a similar claim, the numbers Van Hollen used reflect 10 of the biggest companies as opposed to "insurance companies" in general. And the study did not adequately account for consolidation. But on balance, we rate Van Hollen's statement Mostly True.

Dr. Laura gets RIPPED by Anderson Cooper....

"Everyone is coming after me......" - Dr. Laura

Note to Dr. Laura: Freedom of speech does not absolve you of the RESPONSIBILITY of your speech!


CNN's Anderson Cooper Will Lend His Voice to Daniel Radcliffe Revival of How to Succeed...

By Andrew Gans
and Adam Hetrick
18 Jan 2011

Anderson Cooper and Daniel Radcliffe
Anderson Cooper and Daniel Radcliffe
Photo by J. Anderson/B. Glikas

Emmy and Peabody Award-winning journalist Anderson Cooper will make his Broadway debut as the pre-recorded voice of the narrator in the upcoming revival of How to Succeed in Business Without Really Trying starring Daniel Radcliffe. Performances will begin Feb. 26 at the Al Hirschfeld Theatre.

Cooper follows in the footsteps of Walter Cronkite, who was the voice of the narrator in the 1995 revival of the musical starring Matthew Broderick.

"Harry Potter" and Equus star Radcliffe will star as J. Pierrepont Finch with Emmy Award-winning actor John Larroquette ("Night Court") as World Wide Wicket Company president J.B. Biggley.

Principal casting also features Emmy Award winner and Tony Award nominee Tammy Blanchard (Gypsy, "Life with Judy Garland: Me and My Shadows") as office bombshell Hedy La Rue, Christopher J. Hanke (In My Life, Cry-Baby) as Bud Frump, Rose Hemingway (Parade at the Mark Taper Forum) in her Broadway debut as Rosemary Pilkington, Rob Bartlett (Chicago, Little Shop of Horrors) as Twimble/Wally Womper, Mary Faber (American Idiot, Avenue Q) as Smitty and Ellen Harvey (Thou Shalt Not, The Music Man) as Miss Jones. Michael Park (Middletown) joins the cast as Bert Bratt.

The How to Succeed ensemble will feature Cameron Adams, Cleve Asbury, Tanya Birl, Kevin Covert, Paige Faure, David Hull, Justin Keyes, Marty Lawson, Erica Mansfield, Barrett Martin, Nick Mayo, Sarah O'Gleby, Stephanie Rothenberg, Megan Sikora, Michaeljon Slinger, Joey Sorge, Matt Wall, Ryan Watkinson, Charlie Williams and Samantha Zack.

Directed and choreographed by Tony Award winner Rob Ashford (Promises, Promises), How to Succeedwill officially open March 27.

Designing the production are Derek McLane (set design) Catherine Zuber (costume design), Howell Binkley (lighting design), Jon Weston (sound design), Doug Besterman (orchestrations) and David Chase (music director and arranger).

The 50th anniversary revival is produced by Broadway Across America (John Gore, Thomas B. McGrath, Beth Williams), Craig Zadan, Neil Meron, Joseph Smith, Michael McCabe, Candy Spelling, Takonkiet Viravan/Scenario Thailand, Two Left Feet Productions/PowerArts, Jen Namoff/Fakston Productions, Hilary A. Williams, Larry Kaye/Paul Chau/Daniel Frishwasser/Michael Jackowitz, Michael Speyer-Bernie Abrams/Jacki Florin-Adam Blanshay/TBS Service.

How to Succeed… features a score by Loesser with a book by Abe Burrows, Jack Weinstock and Willie Gilbert. The original 1961 production earned seven Tony Awards, including Best Musical, Best Author and Best Score, as well as the Pulitzer Prize for Drama. Robert Morse earned a Tony Award for his performance as J. Pierrepont Finch.

How to Succeed… follows a young window washer, who with the help of the titular book, rises to the top of the World Wide Wickets Company in New York City.

Rob Ashford earned a 2002 Best Choreography Tony Award forThoroughly Modern Millie. He has been Tony-nominated for Cry-Baby, Curtains and The Wedding Singer. He earned acclaim for directing the Donmar Warehouse productions of A Streetcar Named Desire and Parade.

Can't take the heat?

For me this is a compelling parallel process. Kittleman is obviously a moderate, but he tried to stand up for something that he feels is important, same-sex civil unions. Cool. Thank you for your efforts. But when he gets flack from his base he decides to back down.

So, just what exactly do you think would happen Mr. Kittleman if [insert oppressed minority group] when faced with adversity from what we thought might be a supportive community just stepped back?

We do not have the option to exit the kitchen. At the very least, acknowledge, that you have the privilege to step out for some fresh air.


washingtonpost.com


Kittleman ending run as Md. Senate's GOP leader

By Ann E. Marimow and John Wagner
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, January 19, 2011; B08

The ranking Republican in the Maryland Senate surprised his colleagues and the GOP establishment Tuesday when he announced that he will step down as minority leader because it had become apparent his colleagues did not want a "social moderate" as their leader.

The decision by Sen. Allan H. Kittleman (R-Howard County) came two weeks after he announced plans to sponsor legislation allowing civil unions in Maryland for both same-sex and heterosexual couples.

Kittleman's position put him at odds with many Republican colleagues, who told him during a closed-door meeting last week that they were distressed by his civil-unions bill and would not be supporting the legislation, according to participants.

Kittleman said he decided over the weekend that the other 11 GOP senators in the 47-member Senate should have a leader who is "more conservative than I am on social issues."

"I don't want to have them worry every time I get on the floor, 'What is he going to say?' " Kittleman explained, adding that the decision gives him "the freedom to be who I am, to champion issues I really care about without worrying about stepping on anyone's toes."

His decision comes as the state Republican Party is at a crossroads after Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s double-digit defeat in his November rematch with Gov. Martin O'Malley (D). In December, the party elected former senator Alex X. Mooney as its chairman, choosing a conservative over the more-moderate Mary D. Kane, who was Ehrlich's running mate.

But on Tuesday, in a phone call to the senator and a statement to the media, Mooney urged Kittleman to reconsider his decision.

"While Republicans in elected office and Republican voters at the grassroots level will not agree on every issue," Mooney said in the statement, Kittleman's overall record fits "well within the values of the Republican Party."

Towson University professor Richard E. Vatz, who is close to Ehrlich, said that in a state where registered Democrats outnumber registered Republicans 2 to 1, the GOP must decide, "Do you want to be ideologically pure or electorally viable?"

Vatz, who teaches political rhetoric, said Kittleman's decision to step down was wise if he has aspirations to run statewide or countywide in 2014. In Kittleman's back yard of Howard, O'Malley won 54 percent of the vote. His district - which also includes part of Carroll County - favored Ehrlich, according to an analysis by the Maryland State Board of Elections.

"Having gratuitous fights would simply wreck the party at this point and is not in his interest," Vatz said. "That's not the role that wins people over to the Republican side."

Kittleman is the son of the late civil rights activist Robert Kittleman, who was minority leader in the House and head of the Howard County NAACP.

The legislation the younger Kittleman is considering would give heterosexual and same-sex couples joined through civil unions the same benefits as married partners but would "protect the rights of religious institutions to define marriage as they choose." His effort comes as the prospects for legalizing same-sex marriage in Maryland appear to have significantly improved since the November election.

Kittleman said in an interview Tuesday that having the freedom to speak about his support for civil unions sends a signal to residents that "there are Republicans in Maryland who support these issues. . . . We are more of a big tent than people sometimes think."

Kittleman, who has been minority leader for two years, stressed that his colleagues did not pressure him or ask him to resign. "No one encouraged him to step down nor did we expect him to step down. He has been an excellent Minority Leader," Sen. Nancy Jacobs (R-Harford) said in an e-mail.

He will officially step down once a new leader is selected, which could happen Friday.

Minority Whip David R. Brinkley (R-Frederick), the No. 2 Republican in the Senate, said he is interested in the job. Jacobs, a former minority whip, said she has not yet decided whether to seek the position.

marimowa@washpost.com wagnerj@washpost.com